Volkswagen Golf 2017 vs Volkswagen Polo 2017

 
Volkswagen Golf
2017 -
Volkswagen Polo
2017 - 2020
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 245 HP200 HP
Torque: 370 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.2 seconds6.7 seconds
Volkswagen Golf is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Golf engine produces 45 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.55.9
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 90 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres40 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle670 km in combined cycle
940 km on highway810 km on highway
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.27 m4.05 m
Width: 1.80 m1.75 m
Height: 1.44 m1.45 m
Volkswagen Golf is larger, but slightly lower.
Volkswagen Golf is 22 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres351 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1079 litres
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Golf has 29 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8701`750
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Golf has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 17 4008600
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv