Volkswagen Golf 2017 vs Kia Ceed 2015

 
Volkswagen Golf
2017 - 2019
Kia Ceed
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 125 HP130 HP
Torque: 200 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.1 seconds10.5 seconds
Volkswagen Golf is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Golf engine produces 5 HP less power than Kia Ceed, but torque is 40 NM more than Kia Ceed. Despite less power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.26.4
Real fuel consumption: 6.7 l/100km6.6 l/100km
By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres53 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 960 km in combined cycle820 km in combined cycle
1110 km on highway1030 km on highway
740 km with real consumption800 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 380'000 km280'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Golf engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 13 years20 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Skoda Superb, Seat Leon, Audi A1Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Ceed might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Volkswagen Golf engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Volkswagen Golf 2017 1.4 engine: The engine is reliable, however, owners frequently report excessive oil consumption, which is usually linked to piston ring issues. Loss of power is another common complaint. It's advised against maintaining ...  More about Volkswagen Golf 2017 1.4 engine 

Kia Ceed 2015 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low.

Dimensions

Length: 4.26 m4.31 m
Width: 1.79 m1.78 m
Height: 1.49 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Golf is 5 cm shorter than the Kia Ceed, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1270 litres1318 litres
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.3 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed.
Gross weight: 1`770 kg1`820 kg
Net weight:1`195 kg1`196 kg
Load capacity:575 kg624 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

below average
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 12 2008600
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • timing belt engine
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • fewer faults
Kia Ceed has
  • timing chain engine
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv