Volkswagen Golf 2017 vs Skoda Rapid 2017

 
Volkswagen Golf
2017 - 2019
Skoda Rapid
2017 -
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 110 HP110 HP
Torque: 200 NM200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 seconds9.8 seconds
Volkswagen Golf and Skoda Rapid have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.34.6
Real fuel consumption: 5.9 l/100km5.9 l/100km
The Skoda Rapid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 105 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 940 km in combined cycle1190 km in combined cycle
1080 km on highway1370 km on highway
840 km with real consumption930 km with real consumption
Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.26 m4.30 m
Width: 1.79 m1.71 m
Height: 1.49 m1.46 m
Volkswagen Golf is 5 cm shorter than the Skoda Rapid, 8 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 291 litres415 litres
Skoda Rapid has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Golf has 124 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Rapid.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8701`645
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

average
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Rapid has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably better
Average price (€): 11 2008000
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • fewer faults
Skoda Rapid has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv