Volkswagen Golf 1998 vs Mercedes SLK 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volkswagen Golf
1998 - 2002
Mercedes SLK
2000 - 2004
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Volkswagen Golf is available with front wheel drive, while Mercedes SLK can be equipped with rear wheel drive.
Engines: 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel)2.0 - 3.2 (petrol)

Performance

Power: 75 - 115 HP163 - 354 HP
Torque: 140 - 210 NM230 - 450 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 - 15.5 seconds5.2 - 8.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.2 - 9.49.2 - 11.2
Volkswagen Golf petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes SLK.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.08 m4.01 m
Width: 1.70 m1.72 m
Height: 1.42 m1.27 m
Volkswagen Golf is 7 cm longer than the Mercedes SLK, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 15 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres145 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
448 litres348 litres
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Golf has 125 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes SLK. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 100 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mercedes SLK.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`602~ 1`661
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

high
Average price (€): 24004200
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Mercedes SLK has
  • only petrol engines available
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv