Volkswagen Golf 2011 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Cabrio | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 265 HP | 60 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 350 NM | 108 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 - 12.1 seconds | 7.3 - 16.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 8.2 | 3.8 - 6.2 | |
|
Volkswagen Golf petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. On average, Volkswagen Golf equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.50 m | |
| Volkswagen Golf and Skoda Fabia are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Volkswagen Golf has 230 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.9 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Volkswagen Golf can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`946 | ~ 1`630 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |