Volkswagen Golf 1986 vs Rover 200 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Cabrio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
| Volkswagen Golf is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Rover 200 is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Volkswagen Golf is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Rover 200 can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.8 (petrol, diesel) | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Volkswagen Golf is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 - 160 HP | 103 - 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 96 - 225 NM | 127 - 138 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 18.7 seconds | 8.9 - 10.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 9.4 | 7.1 - 8.5 | |
|
Volkswagen Golf petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Rover 200. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Volkswagen Golf is smaller, but slightly higher. Volkswagen Golf is 23 cm shorter than the Rover 200, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 345 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1145 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Golf has 45 litres more trunk space than the Rover 200. The Rover 200 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.3 metres more than that of the Rover 200. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`463 | ~ 1`565 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Rover 200 has
| |