Volkswagen Golf 2008 vs Volkswagen Polo 2005

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volkswagen Golf
2008 - 2012
Volkswagen Polo
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Volkswagen Golf is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volkswagen Polo can be equipped only with front wheel drive.
Engines: 1.4 - 2.01.2 - 1.9

Performance

Power: 80 - 160 HP55 - 150 HP
Torque: 132 - 320 NM108 - 310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8 - 13.9 seconds8.2 - 17.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.9 - 7.14.4 - 7.8
Volkswagen Golf petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, Volkswagen Golf equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.20 m3.92 m
Width: 1.79 m1.65 m
Height: 1.48 m1.47 m
Volkswagen Golf is larger.
Volkswagen Golf is 28 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 14 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 350 litres270 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1305 litres1030 litres
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Golf has 80 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 275 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Volkswagen Golf can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`861~ 1`663
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

below average
Average price (€): 46002000
Rating in user reviews: 8.7/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv