Volkswagen Golf 2024 vs Volkswagen T-Roc 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Volkswagen Golf is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 333 HP | 110 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 420 NM | 200 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.6 - 10.2 seconds | 4.9 - 10.9 seconds | |
| In general, Volkswagen Golf are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Volkswagen T-Roc. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 0.3 - 8.8 | 4.3 - 6.7 | |
|
Volkswagen Golf petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen T-Roc. On average, Volkswagen Golf equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen T-Roc. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.57 m | |
| Volkswagen Golf is 6 cm longer than the Volkswagen T-Roc, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 381 litres | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1237 litres | 1290 litres | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Volkswagen Golf uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen T-Roc (by 53 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.9 metres more than that of the Volkswagen T-Roc, which means Volkswagen Golf can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`937 kg | ~ 1`945 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`387 kg | ~ 1`402 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 550 kg | ~ 543 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 29 200 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has
| |