Volkswagen Golf 2020 vs Mazda 3 2019

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volkswagen Golf
2020 - 2024
Mazda 3
2019 -
Body: Estate car / wagonSedan
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.0 - 2.01.5 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 110 - 320 HP116 - 250 HP
Torque: 200 - 420 NM153 - 434 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.9 - 10.7 seconds8.1 - 12.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.6 - 7.84.2 - 8.7
Volkswagen Golf petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Volkswagen Golf equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.66 m
Width: 1.79 m1.80 m
Height: 1.47 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Golf is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 611 litres450 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1642 litres1138 litres
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 504 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mazda 3.
Gross weight: ~ 1`986 kg~ 1`913 kg
Net weight:~ 1`386 kg~ 1`402 kg
Load capacity:~ 600 kg~ 511 kg
Volkswagen Golf load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem more than Mazda 3. Therefore, Volkswagen Golf is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): no data14 600
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv