Volkswagen Golf 2017 vs Skoda Rapid 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Volkswagen Golf is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Skoda Rapid can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 | 1.0 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 - 310 HP | 90 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 400 NM | 160 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.6 - 11.9 seconds | 8.9 - 11.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 7.9 | 4.0 - 4.8 | |
|
Volkswagen Golf petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Rapid. On average, Volkswagen Golf equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
| Volkswagen Golf is 4 cm shorter than the Skoda Rapid, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 415 litres | |
|
Skoda Rapid has more luggage space. Volkswagen Golf has 35 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`891 | ~ 1`684 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 800 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |