Toyota RAV4 2013 vs Opel Antara 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 146 HP | 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 187 NM | 217 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Opel Antara is a more dynamic driving. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 21 HP less power than Opel Antara, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Opel Antara. Due to the lower power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.8 | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota RAV4 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has 4x4: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive with Auto, Lock and Sport modes. In Auto mode, the car has front-wheel drive under normal conditions. If wheel slip is detected, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. In Sport mode, torque is transferred almost instantaneously between the front and rear wheels to improve cornering performance, with up to 50 percent of engine power going to the rear wheels. Lock mode can be activated at speeds below 40 km/h and provides constant four-wheel drive. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Antara engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Camry | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Captiva, Chevrolet Malibu | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2013 2.0 engine: Owners often report increasing oil consumption, which becomes particularly pronounced over time. Additionally, the water pump has a limited service life, and after 150,000 km, the timing chain tends to ... More about Toyota RAV4 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is smaller. Toyota RAV4 is 3 cm shorter than the Opel Antara, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 577 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1705 litres | 1391 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota RAV4 has 175 litres more trunk space than the Opel Antara. The Opel Antara may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 314 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | 2`183 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Opel Antara has
| |