Toyota RAV4 2013 vs Toyota RAV4 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
| Toyota RAV4 2013 engine produces 1 HP less power than Toyota RAV4 2010, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Toyota RAV4 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 2013 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4 2010, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota RAV4 2013 could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 2013 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4 2010. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2012: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive with Auto, Lock and Sport modes. In Auto mode, the car has front-wheel drive under normal conditions. If wheel slip is detected, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. In Sport mode, torque is transferred almost instantaneously between the front and rear wheels to improve cornering performance, with up to 50 percent of engine power going to the rear wheels. Lock mode can be activated at speeds below 40 km/h and provides constant four-wheel drive. Toyota RAV4 2010: It has proactive automatic all-wheel drive and acts as front-wheel drive under normal conditions. In the event of wheel slip, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. The clutch can also be locked manually using a button on the console. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2013 is larger, but slightly lower. Toyota RAV4 2013 is 21 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4 2010, 3 cm wider, while the height of Toyota RAV4 2013 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 577 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1705 litres | 1752 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Toyota RAV4 2013 has 9 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4 2010. This could mean that the Toyota RAV4 2013 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 2010 (by 47 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 2013 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4 2010, which means Toyota RAV4 2013 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`240 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |