Toyota RAV4 2013 vs Jeep Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Toyota RAV4 engine produces 21 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Despite less power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota RAV4 could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla Verso, Toyota Verso | Used also on Jeep Renegade | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2013 2.2 engine: The AD-series turbo diesel engines were introduced in Toyota vehicles in 2005 and remained in production until 2018. The first model was a 2.2-liter engine, followed by a 2.0-liter version. Both engines share an 86 mm ... More about Toyota RAV4 2013 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota RAV4 is 5 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 577 litres | 412 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1705 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota RAV4 has 165 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. The Jeep Cherokee may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`240 | 2`475 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Jeep Cherokee scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |