Toyota RAV4 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is more dynamic to drive. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 30 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota RAV4 could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1280 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has 4x4: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive with Auto, Lock and Sport modes. In Auto mode, the car has front-wheel drive under normal conditions. If wheel slip is detected, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. In Sport mode, torque is transferred almost instantaneously between the front and rear wheels to improve cornering performance, with up to 50 percent of engine power going to the rear wheels. Lock mode can be activated at speeds below 40 km/h and provides constant four-wheel drive. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Auris, Lexus IS | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda HR-V | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2013 2.2 engine: The Toyota 2AD-FHV (2.2 D-CAT) is a powerful diesel engine, but it is also known for a number of serious reliability concerns. While it delivers strong performance, ownership costs can rise significantly once the mileage reaches around 150,000–200,000 km.
The most notorious weakness is failure of the ... More about Toyota RAV4 2013 2.2 engine Honda CR-V 2013 1.6 engine: The Honda N16A diesel can be a good choice when properly maintained, but it is not the easiest engine to own in markets where it is rare. Its long-term reliability depends heavily on good fuel, frequent fuel ... More about Honda CR-V 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota RAV4 and Honda CR-V are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 577 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1705 litres | 1669 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Toyota RAV4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`240 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Toyota RAV4 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 9800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |