Toyota RAV4 2013 vs Renault Koleos 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Toyota RAV4 engine produces 24 HP less power than Renault Koleos, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Renault Koleos. Despite less power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Koleos is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla Verso, Toyota Verso | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Koleos might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2013 2.2 engine: The AD-series turbo diesel engines were introduced in Toyota vehicles in 2005 and remained in production until 2018. The first model was a 2.2-liter engine, followed by a 2.0-liter version. Both engines share an 86 mm ... More about Toyota RAV4 2013 2.2 engine Renault Koleos 2013 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota RAV4 is 5 cm longer than the Renault Koleos, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 577 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1705 litres | 1380 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Toyota RAV4 has 127 litres more trunk space than the Renault Koleos. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 325 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Koleos. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`240 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Renault Koleos scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Renault Koleos has
| |