Toyota RAV4 2013 vs Nissan X-Trail 2016
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 149 HP | 177 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10 seconds | |
Toyota RAV4 engine produces 28 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
680 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Toyota RAV4 2012: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive with Auto, Lock and Sport modes. In Auto mode, the car has front-wheel drive under normal conditions. If wheel slip is detected, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. In Sport mode, torque is transferred almost instantaneously between the front and rear wheels to improve cornering performance, with up to 50 percent of engine power going to the rear wheels. Lock mode can be activated at speeds below 40 km/h and provides constant four-wheel drive. Nissan X-Trail 2014: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 13 years | 14 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla Verso, Toyota Verso | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Toyota RAV4 2013 2.2 engine: The AD-series turbo diesel engines were introduced in Toyota vehicles in 2005 and remained in production until 2018. The first model was a 2.2-liter engine, followed by a 2.0-liter version. Both engines share an 86 mm ... More about Toyota RAV4 2013 2.2 engine Nissan X-Trail 2016 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.57 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.67 m | 1.72 m | |
Toyota RAV4 is 7 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 3 cm wider, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 577 litres | 135 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1705 litres | 1877 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Toyota RAV4 has 442 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 172 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`240 | 2`400 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | below average | |
Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 12 200 | 11 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |