Toyota RAV4 2013 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 25 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Due to the lower power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota RAV4 could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Auris, Lexus IS | Used also on Mazda 6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2013 2.2 engine: The Toyota 2AD-FHV (2.2 D-CAT) is a powerful diesel engine, but it is also known for a number of serious reliability concerns. While it delivers strong performance, ownership costs can rise significantly once the mileage reaches around 150,000–200,000 km.
The most notorious weakness is failure of the ... More about Toyota RAV4 2013 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota RAV4 is 2 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 577 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1705 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Toyota RAV4 has 74 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 85 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`240 kg | 2`140 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |