Toyota RAV4 2013 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 146 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 187 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 29 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 233 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Due to the lower power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2015: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Camry | Used also on Mazda 6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2013 2.0 engine: Owners often report increasing oil consumption, which becomes particularly pronounced over time. Additionally, the water pump has a limited service life, and after 150,000 km, the timing chain tends to ... More about Toyota RAV4 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota RAV4 is 2 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 577 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1705 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Toyota RAV4 has 74 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 85 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |