Toyota RAV4 2010 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
| Toyota RAV4 engine produces 20 HP more power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Mazda CX-5. Despite the higher power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 6.7 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota RAV4 consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota RAV4 could require 435 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Previa, Toyota Camry | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mazda CX-5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.67 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 586 litres | 463 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1752 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota RAV4 has 123 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The Mazda CX-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 132 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`045 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota RAV4 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |