Toyota RAV4 2010 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 251 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota RAV4 engine produces 14 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 26 NM less than Mazda CX-5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2010 2.4 engine: A fairly robust engine, easy to maintain and spare parts are readily available. Not too sensitive to fuel quality. High oil consumption and relatively short chain life (around 170 000 km). | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.71 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 586 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1752 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mazda CX-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 132 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`058 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota RAV4 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |