Toyota RAV4 2010 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Toyota RAV4 and Nissan Qashqai have the same engine power, but Toyota RAV4 torque is 20 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Qashqai can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla Verso, Toyota Verso | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is larger. Toyota RAV4 is 4 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 3 cm wider, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 586 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1752 litres | 1513 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Toyota RAV4 has 176 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 239 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Toyota RAV4 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | 2`085 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |