Toyota RAV4 2010 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 40 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla Verso, Toyota Verso | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2010 2.2 engine: The AD-series turbo diesel engines were introduced in Toyota vehicles in 2005 and remained in production until 2018. The first model was a 2.2-liter engine, followed by a 2.0-liter version. Both engines share an 86 mm ... More about Toyota RAV4 2010 2.2 engine Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.61 m | |
| Toyota RAV4 is 1 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 586 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1752 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Toyota RAV4 has 36 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |