Toyota RAV4 2010 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 158 HP | 247 HP | |
| Torque: | 198 NM | 329 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 89 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 131 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 13.4 | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota RAV4 consumes 5.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 885 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is smaller. Toyota RAV4 is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 586 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1752 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | 2`665 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |