Toyota RAV4 2010 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 158 HP | 169 HP | |
| Torque: | 198 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 11 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | no data | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has 4x4: It has proactive automatic all-wheel drive and acts as front-wheel drive under normal conditions. In the event of wheel slip, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. The clutch can also be locked manually using a button on the console. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Lexus NX, Toyota C-HR | Used also on Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Toyota RAV4 is 27 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 3 cm wider, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 586 litres | 603 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1752 litres | no data | |
| Toyota RAV4 has 17 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |