Toyota RAV4 2010 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 158 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 198 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 8 HP more power than Mazda CX-5, but torque is 12 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Despite the higher power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.7 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota RAV4 could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Lexus NX, Toyota C-HR | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is smaller, but higher. Toyota RAV4 is 18 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 586 litres | 463 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1752 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota RAV4 has 123 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The Mazda CX-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 132 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | 2`045 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota RAV4 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |