Toyota RAV4 2010 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 158 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 198 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 82 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 142 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota RAV4 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Lexus NX, Toyota C-HR | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XJ, Jaguar XF | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.64 m | |
| Toyota RAV4 is 1 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 586 litres | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1752 litres | no data | |
| Toyota RAV4 has 11 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |