Toyota RAV4 2010 vs Jeep Patriot 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 158 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 198 NM | 223 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota RAV4 engine produces 16 HP less power than Jeep Patriot, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Jeep Patriot. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.8 | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota RAV4 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Patriot, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 640 km on highway | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2010: It has proactive automatic all-wheel drive and acts as front-wheel drive under normal conditions. In the event of wheel slip, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. The clutch can also be locked manually using a button on the console. Jeep Patriot 2007: Patriot has Freedom Drive I - electronically controlled four-wheel drive system. Normally, the car is front-wheel drive, but if wheel slip is detected, it can automatically send up to 50% power to the rear wheels. The system is not designed for off-road use, but mainly for snow and similar conditions with limited traction. Freedom Drive II version adds an off-road four-wheel drive mode, traction control, optimized engine and transmission performance for rock crawling, and hill descent control (not in EU editions). | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Lexus NX, Toyota C-HR | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Dodge Caliber, Dodge Avenger, Chrysler Sebring, Jeep Compass | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Patriot might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.64 m | |
| Toyota RAV4 is 5 cm shorter than the Jeep Patriot, 6 cm wider, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 586 litres | 652 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1752 litres | 1777 litres | |
|
Jeep Patriot has more luggage space. Toyota RAV4 has 66 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Patriot. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Patriot (by 25 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Jeep Patriot has
| |