Toyota RAV4 2010 vs Audi Q3 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 158 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 198 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 12 HP less power than Audi Q3, whereas torque is 82 NM less than Audi Q3. Due to the lower power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 191 mm (7.5 inches) | 184 mm (7.2 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Lexus NX, Toyota C-HR | Used also on Volkswagen Tiguan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is smaller, but higher. Toyota RAV4 is 2 cm shorter than the Audi Q3, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 586 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1752 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota RAV4 has 126 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q3. The Audi Q3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Audi Q3, which means Toyota RAV4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | 2`155 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Audi Q3 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Toyota RAV4, so Audi Q3 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |