Toyota RAV4 2010 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 158 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 198 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Toyota RAV4 engine produces 17 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 191 mm (7.5 inches) | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Qashqai can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Lexus NX, Toyota C-HR | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Serena | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is larger. Toyota RAV4 is 4 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 3 cm wider, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 586 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1752 litres | 1513 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Toyota RAV4 has 176 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 239 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Toyota RAV4 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |