Toyota RAV4 2001 vs Jeep Cherokee 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
| Toyota RAV4 engine produces 34 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Despite less power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 420 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Corolla Verso | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2001 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota RAV4 2001 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is smaller. Toyota RAV4 is 24 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 820 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 1950 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage space. Toyota RAV4 has 420 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 800 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`930 | 2`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |