Toyota RAV4 2001 vs Honda CR-V 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 12 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 68 NM more than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2000: Vehicle has full-time all wheel drive with viscous coupling locking center differential and can have optional Torsen limited-slip rear differential. Honda CR-V 1997: Car has Honda`s real-time four-wheel drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. Multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to clutch by dual pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Corolla Verso | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2001 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota RAV4 2001 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota RAV4 is 33 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 670 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota RAV4 has 25 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 480 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`930 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |