Toyota RAV4 2001 vs Nissan X-Trail 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is more dynamic to drive. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 2 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 20 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2000: Vehicle has full-time all wheel drive with viscous coupling locking center differential and can have optional Torsen limited-slip rear differential. Nissan X-Trail 2001: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2001 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota RAV4 2001 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota RAV4 is 31 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 1841 litres | |
| Toyota RAV4 has 10 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 691 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Toyota RAV4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`930 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |