Toyota RAV4 2000 vs Suzuki Vitara 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is more dynamic to drive. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 14 HP more power than Suzuki Vitara, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Suzuki Vitara. Thanks to more power Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 10.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 600 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Avensis Verso | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2000 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter gasoline engine debuted in 2000 as a replacement for the 3S-FE. It features an aluminum block with cast-iron liners and an open cooling jacket, an aluminum 16-valve DOHC cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, and a chain-driven timing system. Most versions of ... More about Toyota RAV4 2000 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is larger, but slightly lower. Toyota RAV4 is 8 cm longer than the Suzuki Vitara, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 263 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 438 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Toyota RAV4 has 137 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 712 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Suzuki Vitara, which means Toyota RAV4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`825 | 1`875 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Vitara has serious deffects in 290 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
| |