Toyota RAV4 2000 vs Land Rover Freelander 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 161 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is more dynamic to drive. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 8 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 1 NM more than Land Rover Freelander. Thanks to more power Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 10.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota RAV4 2000 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota RAV4 2000 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is smaller. Toyota RAV4 is 18 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 1 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Toyota RAV4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Land Rover Freelander has serious deffects in 135 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 5.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |