Toyota RAV4 2025 vs Subaru Forester 2024
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Hybrid | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Toyota RAV4) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Subaru Forester) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 186 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 NM | 241 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota RAV4 engine produces 6 HP more power than Subaru Forester, but torque is 8 NM less than Subaru Forester. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 5.7 l/100km + 19.6 kWh/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 16.70 € | 15.30 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/lElectricity€/kWh | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | no data | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 206 mm (8.1 inches) | 221 mm (8.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Subaru Forester can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.73 m | |
| Toyota RAV4 is 6 cm shorter than the Subaru Forester, 5 cm wider, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 949 litres | 779 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1801 litres | 2107 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Subaru Forester may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru Forester (by 306 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`508 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |