Toyota RAV4 2025 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Hybrid | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Toyota RAV4) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Nissan X-Trail) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 186 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
| Toyota RAV4 engine produces 23 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 7 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 5.7 l/100km + 19.6 kWh/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 16.40 € | 11.50 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/lElectricity€/kWh | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | no data | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 206 mm (8.1 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota RAV4 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Toyota RAV4 is 9 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 6 cm wider, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 949 litres | 135 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 135 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 949 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1801 litres | 1877 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space (by 399 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 76 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`508 kg | 2`210 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`012 kg | 1`615 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 496 kg | 595 kg | |
| Toyota RAV4 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem less than Nissan X-Trail. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 43 400 | 24 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |