Toyota RAV4 2021 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Toyota RAV4) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Nissan X-Trail) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 249 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Toyota RAV4 engine produces 73 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 71 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 5.1 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota RAV4 consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota RAV4 could require 495 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota RAV4 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
| Toyota RAV4 is 8 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1062 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1977 litres | 1877 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 100 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`134 kg | 2`310 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`640 kg | 1`590 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 494 kg | 720 kg | |
| Toyota RAV4 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 46 procentiem less than Nissan X-Trail. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 37 400 | 24 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |