Toyota RAV4 2020 vs Volvo XC60 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Hybrid | 2.0 Hybrid | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 227 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 seconds | 5.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 135 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 173 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.0 | 2.1 | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota RAV4 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 5500 km in combined cycle | 2380 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2019: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive with Auto, Lock and Sport modes. In Auto mode, the car has front-wheel drive under normal conditions. If wheel slip is detected, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. In Sport mode, torque is transferred almost instantly between the front and rear wheels to enhance cornering performance by transferring up to 50 percent of engine power to the rear wheels. Lock mode can be activated when driving below 40 km/h (25 mph) and provides constant four-wheel drive. Volvo XC60 2017: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). | |||
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota RAV4 is 9 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1604 litres | 1432 litres | |
| Toyota RAV4 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 172 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Toyota RAV4 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`510 kg | 2`700 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`910 kg | 2`120 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 600 kg | 580 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Volvo XC60 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 23 000 | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |