Toyota RAV4 2020 vs Skoda Karoq 2019
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Hybrid | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Toyota RAV4) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Skoda Karoq) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 227 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
| Toyota RAV4 engine produces 5 HP less power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 93 NM less than Skoda Karoq. Despite less power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 1.0 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 13.00 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 5500 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is larger. Toyota RAV4 is 22 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, 1 cm wider, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1604 litres | 1630 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Toyota RAV4 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 26 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Skoda Karoq, which means Toyota RAV4 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`510 kg | 2`213 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`910 kg | 1`480 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 600 kg | 733 kg | |
| Toyota RAV4 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem less than Skoda Karoq. Therefore, Skoda Karoq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Toyota RAV4 scores higher in safety tests, but Skoda Karoq is better rated in child safety tests. The Toyota RAV4 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 000 | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |