Toyota RAV4 2015 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 HP | 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 256 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 37 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 46 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Due to the lower power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2015: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 177 mm (7 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda CX-5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota RAV4 is 5 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 501 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1633 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Toyota RAV4 has 2 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 13 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`270 | 2`075 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |