Toyota RAV4 2011 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 25 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Due to the lower power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota RAV4 could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla Verso, Toyota Verso | Used also on Mazda 6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Toyota RAV4 is 18 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 2 cm wider, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 586 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1752 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota RAV4 has 81 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The Mazda CX-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 132 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Toyota RAV4 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota RAV4 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |