Toyota RAV4 2011 vs Volvo XC60 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is more dynamic to drive. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 2 HP more power than Volvo XC60, but torque is 20 NM less than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota RAV4 could require 105 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2010: It has proactive automatic all-wheel drive and acts as front-wheel drive under normal conditions. In the event of wheel slip, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. The clutch can also be locked manually using a button on the console. Volvo XC60 2008: The car is fitted with Haldex Generation IV proactive automatic all-wheel drive. Haldex processes data from the ABS control unit and the engine control unit and can increase the pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement when required. It has a 100% front to 0% rear torque split when not engaged with a maximum 50% to 50% torque split between axes. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is smaller. Toyota RAV4 is 30 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 586 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1752 litres | 1455 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota RAV4 has 91 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 297 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC60 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |