Toyota RAV4 2009 vs Jeep Compass 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is more dynamic to drive. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 10 HP more power than Jeep Compass, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Jeep Compass. Thanks to more power Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.5 | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2009: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive and acts as front-wheel drive under normal conditions. In the event of wheel slip, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. The clutch can also be locked manually using a button on the console. Jeep Compass 2006: It has Freedom Drive I - an electronically controlled four-wheel drive system. Normally the car is in front-wheel drive, but if wheel slip is detected, it can automatically send up to 50% power to the rear wheels. The system is primarily designed for snow and similar conditions with limited traction. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla Verso, Toyota Verso | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2009 2.2 engine: The AD-series turbo diesel engines were introduced in Toyota vehicles in 2005 and remained in production until 2018. The first model was a 2.2-liter engine, followed by a 2.0-liter version. Both engines share an 86 mm ... More about Toyota RAV4 2009 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.63 m | |
| Toyota RAV4 is 6 cm shorter than the Jeep Compass, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 334 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1752 litres | 1277 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota RAV4 has 116 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Compass. The Jeep Compass may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 475 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |