Toyota RAV4 2009 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 273 HP | 233 HP | |
| Torque: | 332 NM | 291 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Toyota RAV4 engine produces 40 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 41 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Despite the higher power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 10.6 | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota RAV4 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Toyota RAV4 is 16 cm shorter than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 398 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota RAV4 has 52 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. The Suzuki Grand Vitara may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`280 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Grand Vitara has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |