Toyota RAV4 2009 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 182 HP | 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is more dynamic to drive. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 16 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 9.5 | |
| Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota RAV4 could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2007: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Camry | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota RAV4 is 18 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 955 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Toyota RAV4 has 106 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota RAV4 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |