Toyota RAV4 2019 vs Volvo XC60 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 222 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 221 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 6.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 27 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 129 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1190 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2019: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive with Auto, Lock and Sport modes. In Auto mode, the car has front-wheel drive under normal conditions. If wheel slip is detected, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. In Sport mode, torque is transferred almost instantly between the front and rear wheels to enhance cornering performance by transferring up to 50 percent of engine power to the rear wheels. Lock mode can be activated when driving below 40 km/h (25 mph) and provides constant four-wheel drive. Volvo XC60 2017: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota RAV4 is 9 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1432 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota RAV4 has 75 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Toyota RAV4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`470 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Volvo XC60 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC60 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 28 200 | 29 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |