Toyota RAV4 2019 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Toyota RAV4) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Nissan X-Trail) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 221 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is more dynamic to drive. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 41 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 159 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Toyota RAV4 is 9 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1690 litres | 1877 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 187 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`135 kg | 2`170 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`590 kg | 1`655 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 545 kg | 515 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 120 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 23 200 | 24 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |