Toyota RAV4 2019 vs Subaru Forester 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 208 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester is a more dynamic driving. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 28 HP more power than Subaru Forester, but torque is 142 NM less than Subaru Forester. Despite the higher power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota RAV4 could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Subaru Forester gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Subaru Forester engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Lexus UX | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Outback, Subaru Legacy | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Subaru Forester might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is larger, but lower. Toyota RAV4 and Subaru Forester are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1690 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Toyota RAV4 has 75 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Toyota RAV4 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`155 | 2`080 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 27 400 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |