Toyota RAV4 2019 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 208 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota RAV4 and Mazda CX-5 have the same engine power, but Toyota RAV4 torque is 212 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
| By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 195 mm (7.7 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Lexus UX | Used also on Mazda 6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda CX-5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota RAV4 is 5 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 2 cm wider, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1690 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Toyota RAV4 has 77 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 70 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`155 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 27 400 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |