Toyota RAV4 2019 vs Audi Q3 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 208 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 15 HP less power than Audi Q3, whereas torque is 112 NM less than Audi Q3. Due to the lower power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi Q3 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Lexus UX | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi Q3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is larger. Toyota RAV4 is 10 cm longer than the Audi Q3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1690 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Toyota RAV4 has 50 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`065 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Audi Q3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota RAV4 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Audi Q3, so Audi Q3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 26 600 | 31 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |